https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212547 The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge against the acquisition order under Section 269 UD(1), upholding the property's vesting in the Central Government. The rights and obligations of the tenant were clarified, indicating the loss of protection under rent control laws. With the property now under government ownership, the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956 ceased to apply. The petitioner, an elderly widow, offered to vacate the premises by a specified date, which the court accepted, concluding the legal proceedings without costs. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212547 The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge against the acquisition order under Section 269 UD(1), upholding the property's vesting in the Central Government. The rights and obligations of the tenant were clarified, indicating the loss of protection under rent control laws. With the property now under government ownership, the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1956 ceased to apply. The petitioner, an elderly widow, offered to vacate the premises by a specified date, which the court accepted, concluding the legal proceedings without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212547