<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 488 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the exemption under Section 47(xiv) for long-term capital gain. It was determined that the conditions for exemption were met as all assets and liabilities were transferred to the company, the sole proprietor received shares as consideration, and despite a delay in share allotment, the sole proprietor held nearly 99% of the shares, surpassing the required 50%. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to prevent asset transfers to others to avoid capital gains tax, noting that in this case, the assets remained with the company where the sole proprietor held a significant majority of shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 488 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the exemption under Section 47(xiv) for long-term capital gain. It was determined that the conditions for exemption were met as all assets and liabilities were transferred to the company, the sole proprietor received shares as consideration, and despite a delay in share allotment, the sole proprietor held nearly 99% of the shares, surpassing the required 50%. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to prevent asset transfers to others to avoid capital gains tax, noting that in this case, the assets remained with the company where the sole proprietor held a significant majority of shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>