<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 482 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212539</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was beyond the permissible period of four years and lacked jurisdiction. The court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s full disclosure during the original assessment and dismissed the argument of alternative remedy, stating reassessment should not occur when the notice is invalid. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 482 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212539</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was beyond the permissible period of four years and lacked jurisdiction. The court emphasized the petitioner&#039;s full disclosure during the original assessment and dismissed the argument of alternative remedy, stating reassessment should not occur when the notice is invalid. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>