<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 453 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals and directed the Assessing Officer to exclude the tax paid by the employer from the &quot;salary&quot; for computing the perquisite value of accommodation provided to the employee. The decision was based on the precedent set in a previous case, holding that the tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employee is a perquisite under section 17(2) and should not be included in the calculation of the perquisite value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 453 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals and directed the Assessing Officer to exclude the tax paid by the employer from the &quot;salary&quot; for computing the perquisite value of accommodation provided to the employee. The decision was based on the precedent set in a previous case, holding that the tax paid by the employer on behalf of the employee is a perquisite under section 17(2) and should not be included in the calculation of the perquisite value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>