<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 451 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212508</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the audited accounts of both the Silvasa Unit and the corporate office to ascertain the essential expenditures incurred for the Silvasa Unit. The expenses with no direct nexus to the Silvasa Unit should not be considered for deductions under Section 80 IA. The fresh assessment was to be completed within three months from the date of communication of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 451 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212508</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the audited accounts of both the Silvasa Unit and the corporate office to ascertain the essential expenditures incurred for the Silvasa Unit. The expenses with no direct nexus to the Silvasa Unit should not be considered for deductions under Section 80 IA. The fresh assessment was to be completed within three months from the date of communication of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>