<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 499 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the deduction under Section 10BA for the assessee engaged in manufacturing wooden handicraft articles. The trading addition was reduced based on lack of evidence, and the disallowance under Section 40A(3) was deleted due to non-applicability of the provisions for the relevant assessment year. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 499 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the deduction under Section 10BA for the assessee engaged in manufacturing wooden handicraft articles. The trading addition was reduced based on lack of evidence, and the disallowance under Section 40A(3) was deleted due to non-applicability of the provisions for the relevant assessment year. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>