<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 490 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and restoring the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the finding that the explanation provided by the assessee was false, and there was a deliberate attempt to claim inadmissible deductions, leading to the penalty being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 490 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order and restoring the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the finding that the explanation provided by the assessee was false, and there was a deliberate attempt to claim inadmissible deductions, leading to the penalty being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>