<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 470 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212475</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the Gross Profit rate for a Gold/Silver export business. The Court emphasized the factual nature of the case, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s explanation, and highlighted the discretionary authority of taxing authorities in determining Gross Profit rates. The appeal was deemed not to involve any substantial question of law, leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 470 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212475</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the Gross Profit rate for a Gold/Silver export business. The Court emphasized the factual nature of the case, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s explanation, and highlighted the discretionary authority of taxing authorities in determining Gross Profit rates. The appeal was deemed not to involve any substantial question of law, leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>