<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 503 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212454</link>
    <description>The Court rejected the Astrologer&#039;s claim that undisclosed income belonged to a Trust due to lack of evidence supporting this assertion in seized documents or statements. The Court accepted the assessee&#039;s settlement offer to add Rs.10,00,000 to the assessment, avoiding further litigation. The settlement offer was considered a reasonable compromise, leading to modification of the assessment based on the agreed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 503 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212454</link>
      <description>The Court rejected the Astrologer&#039;s claim that undisclosed income belonged to a Trust due to lack of evidence supporting this assertion in seized documents or statements. The Court accepted the assessee&#039;s settlement offer to add Rs.10,00,000 to the assessment, avoiding further litigation. The settlement offer was considered a reasonable compromise, leading to modification of the assessment based on the agreed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>