<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 502 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable. It found that the payments made in cash were in pursuance of a principal-agent relationship, entitling the assessee to a commission. The Tribunal emphasized that the genuineness of the expenditure was irrelevant for the application of the provision mandating disallowance based on the mode of payment. Consequently, the disallowance was deleted, and the Stay Petition was dismissed as unfructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 502 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable. It found that the payments made in cash were in pursuance of a principal-agent relationship, entitling the assessee to a commission. The Tribunal emphasized that the genuineness of the expenditure was irrelevant for the application of the provision mandating disallowance based on the mode of payment. Consequently, the disallowance was deleted, and the Stay Petition was dismissed as unfructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>