<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 501 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified for estimated disallowances but was warranted for unexplained credits. The Assessing Officer was directed to recalculate the penalty accordingly. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 501 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified for estimated disallowances but was warranted for unexplained credits. The Assessing Officer was directed to recalculate the penalty accordingly. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>