<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 827 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212444</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities. It held that the activities conducted by the assessee on the purchased cardamom, including washing and grading, did not result in a substantial change to qualify as processed goods under section 80HHC(3)(a) of the Income-tax Act. As the goods were exported in the same form as purchased, without significant alteration, the assessee was not entitled to the deduction for export profit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 827 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212444</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities. It held that the activities conducted by the assessee on the purchased cardamom, including washing and grading, did not result in a substantial change to qualify as processed goods under section 80HHC(3)(a) of the Income-tax Act. As the goods were exported in the same form as purchased, without significant alteration, the assessee was not entitled to the deduction for export profit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>