<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1442 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212435</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the amount in question was not unexplained, as proper books of account were maintained and supported by evidence. The burden of proof was deemed to have been adequately discharged by the assessee, and compliance with the requirements of section 68 was upheld. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings of the authorities regarding the genuineness of the transaction and the capacity of the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1442 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212435</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the amount in question was not unexplained, as proper books of account were maintained and supported by evidence. The burden of proof was deemed to have been adequately discharged by the assessee, and compliance with the requirements of section 68 was upheld. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the findings of the authorities regarding the genuineness of the transaction and the capacity of the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>