<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 298 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212429</link>
    <description>A remand order setting aside the appellate order and sending the matter back for fresh assessment did not finally decide the merits of the dispute. In that situation, the High Court held that the Revenue&#039;s grievance did not raise any substantial question of law requiring adjudication in appeal. The appeal was therefore not maintainable on that issue and was liable to be dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 298 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212429</link>
      <description>A remand order setting aside the appellate order and sending the matter back for fresh assessment did not finally decide the merits of the dispute. In that situation, the High Court held that the Revenue&#039;s grievance did not raise any substantial question of law requiring adjudication in appeal. The appeal was therefore not maintainable on that issue and was liable to be dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>