<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212427</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of valid evidence and the inapplicability of rectification under Section 154 for debatable legal issues regarding deductions under Sections 80HHA and 80I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment serves as a precedent for similar cases, highlighting the significance of factual analysis in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 296 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212427</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of valid evidence and the inapplicability of rectification under Section 154 for debatable legal issues regarding deductions under Sections 80HHA and 80I of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment serves as a precedent for similar cases, highlighting the significance of factual analysis in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>