<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 429 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212406</link>
    <description>The High Court interpreted Section 10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing uniformity in the formula for relief computation to avoid anomalies. It ruled that export turnover should be excluded from total turnover to align with legislative intent. The court held that expenses excluded from export turnover should also be excluded from total turnover. As the interpretation of Section 10A was decisive, the court did not address the setting aside of proceedings under Section 148, ultimately dismissing the appeal in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 429 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212406</link>
      <description>The High Court interpreted Section 10A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing uniformity in the formula for relief computation to avoid anomalies. It ruled that export turnover should be excluded from total turnover to align with legislative intent. The court held that expenses excluded from export turnover should also be excluded from total turnover. As the interpretation of Section 10A was decisive, the court did not address the setting aside of proceedings under Section 148, ultimately dismissing the appeal in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>