<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 464 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212398</link>
    <description>The court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for reopening the assessment for Assessment Year 2004-05, ruling in favor of the petitioner. The court found that there was no evidence of failure to disclose material facts by the petitioner, as the disclosure of the financial restructuring arrangement and waiver of finance cost had been made in the accounts. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of establishing a failure to disclose material facts as a jurisdictional requirement for reopening assessments beyond the statutory timeframe, highlighting the importance of assessing officers providing valid reasons for such actions to prevent exceeding their jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 464 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212398</link>
      <description>The court set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for reopening the assessment for Assessment Year 2004-05, ruling in favor of the petitioner. The court found that there was no evidence of failure to disclose material facts by the petitioner, as the disclosure of the financial restructuring arrangement and waiver of finance cost had been made in the accounts. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of establishing a failure to disclose material facts as a jurisdictional requirement for reopening assessments beyond the statutory timeframe, highlighting the importance of assessing officers providing valid reasons for such actions to prevent exceeding their jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>