<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 797 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212385</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. Regarding the computation of deduction under Section 80-IA for interest income, the court held that interest earned on fixed deposits for availing credit facilities should be treated as income from other sources, not business income. The court emphasized the nexus test and the netting principle in determining eligible deductions. On the allowability of deduction under Section 35D for specific expenditures, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that once the conditions of Section 35D are met, the assessee is entitled to the deduction. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessee&#039;s position in both matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 797 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212385</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. Regarding the computation of deduction under Section 80-IA for interest income, the court held that interest earned on fixed deposits for availing credit facilities should be treated as income from other sources, not business income. The court emphasized the nexus test and the netting principle in determining eligible deductions. On the allowability of deduction under Section 35D for specific expenditures, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that once the conditions of Section 35D are met, the assessee is entitled to the deduction. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessee&#039;s position in both matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>