<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 960 - Madhya Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212381</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. The Court directed the Revenue to treat the amount recovered from seized Hundis as payment of admitted tax, making the appeal competent under s. 249(4) of the IT Act, 1961. The matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on the appeal&#039;s merits without influence from prior orders, with instructions for expeditious handling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 960 - Madhya Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212381</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. The Court directed the Revenue to treat the amount recovered from seized Hundis as payment of admitted tax, making the appeal competent under s. 249(4) of the IT Act, 1961. The matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on the appeal&#039;s merits without influence from prior orders, with instructions for expeditious handling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>