<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 954 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212375</link>
    <description>The appellate authority rejected appeals due to delay in filing under the Income Tax Act. The petitioners challenged this rejection, arguing the authority did not consider the case correctly. The judge directed the authority to condone the delay, noting the managing partner&#039;s lack of expertise in tax laws. The impugned orders were quashed, and the authority was instructed to condone the delay on the condition that the petitioners pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs for both appeals. Further proceedings were to proceed according to the court&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 954 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212375</link>
      <description>The appellate authority rejected appeals due to delay in filing under the Income Tax Act. The petitioners challenged this rejection, arguing the authority did not consider the case correctly. The judge directed the authority to condone the delay, noting the managing partner&#039;s lack of expertise in tax laws. The impugned orders were quashed, and the authority was instructed to condone the delay on the condition that the petitioners pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs for both appeals. Further proceedings were to proceed according to the court&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>