<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 953 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212374</link>
    <description>HC affirmed that software expenditure constituted revenue, not capital, for assessment year 2001-02. Relying on the Tribunal&#039;s earlier final order in the taxpayer&#039;s own case (the Revenue&#039;s appeal for that year having been dismissed for failure to remove objections), the software costs were allowed as revenue expenditure, affecting total turnover and deduction under s. 80HHC. Decision rendered in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 953 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212374</link>
      <description>HC affirmed that software expenditure constituted revenue, not capital, for assessment year 2001-02. Relying on the Tribunal&#039;s earlier final order in the taxpayer&#039;s own case (the Revenue&#039;s appeal for that year having been dismissed for failure to remove objections), the software costs were allowed as revenue expenditure, affecting total turnover and deduction under s. 80HHC. Decision rendered in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>