<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 823 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212370</link>
    <description>The court directed the appellate authority to expedite the disposal of the pending appeal and consider the stay application. The petitioner was instructed to remit the first installment as stipulated, and if done so, further recovery steps would be halted, enabling the petitioner to operate bank accounts despite garnishee orders issued to other parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 823 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212370</link>
      <description>The court directed the appellate authority to expedite the disposal of the pending appeal and consider the stay application. The petitioner was instructed to remit the first installment as stipulated, and if done so, further recovery steps would be halted, enabling the petitioner to operate bank accounts despite garnishee orders issued to other parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>