<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 425 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212354</link>
    <description>Supply of ready mix concrete was treated as a sales contract, not a taxable service, because the arrangement showed a dominant intention to supply goods and no cogent material established any service element. On that basis, the Finance Act, 1994 could not be applied to tax the commodity sale on a mistaken appreciation of fact and law, and the asserted service tax liability was unsustainable. The demand was therefore rejected in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 425 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212354</link>
      <description>Supply of ready mix concrete was treated as a sales contract, not a taxable service, because the arrangement showed a dominant intention to supply goods and no cogent material established any service element. On that basis, the Finance Act, 1994 could not be applied to tax the commodity sale on a mistaken appreciation of fact and law, and the asserted service tax liability was unsustainable. The demand was therefore rejected in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>