<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 494 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212323</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal for remand, directing the Commissioner to review documents in light of the Finance Act, 2010 amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellants had already reversed the Cenvat credit for exempted products, citing compliance with the retrospective amendment. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to tax laws and regulations regarding Cenvat credit utilization for dutiable and exempted final products, emphasizing procedural fairness and statutory compliance in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 494 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212323</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal for remand, directing the Commissioner to review documents in light of the Finance Act, 2010 amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellants had already reversed the Cenvat credit for exempted products, citing compliance with the retrospective amendment. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to tax laws and regulations regarding Cenvat credit utilization for dutiable and exempted final products, emphasizing procedural fairness and statutory compliance in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>