<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 808 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, ruling that the study materials sold by the appellant did not qualify as textbooks exempt from Service tax. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 27 lakhs in five monthly installments to comply with the order. Failure to do so would allow the Department to recover its dues. The appellant was required to provide proof of payment for each installment to the original authority promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 808 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, ruling that the study materials sold by the appellant did not qualify as textbooks exempt from Service tax. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 27 lakhs in five monthly installments to comply with the order. Failure to do so would allow the Department to recover its dues. The appellant was required to provide proof of payment for each installment to the original authority promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>