<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1155 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeal filed by a banking company challenging a service tax and cess levy, emphasizing that strict adherence to instructions was unnecessary once it was satisfied that the company met exemption criteria. The Tribunal directed the company to provide evidence as required by the notification to the original Authority for a fair hearing to determine compliance with notification conditions for a favorable outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1155 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeal filed by a banking company challenging a service tax and cess levy, emphasizing that strict adherence to instructions was unnecessary once it was satisfied that the company met exemption criteria. The Tribunal directed the company to provide evidence as required by the notification to the original Authority for a fair hearing to determine compliance with notification conditions for a favorable outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>