<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1150 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority, emphasizing that the Revenue could not introduce new grounds for imposing service tax at the appellate stage. The judgment highlighted the importance of adherence to the show-cause notice and the prohibition against raising new cases during the appeal process, as established by legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1150 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority, emphasizing that the Revenue could not introduce new grounds for imposing service tax at the appellate stage. The judgment highlighted the importance of adherence to the show-cause notice and the prohibition against raising new cases during the appeal process, as established by legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>