<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 936 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212280</link>
    <description>Availment of DEPB benefit does not, by itself, bar exemption under Notification No. 32/97-Cus.; the decisive question is whether the importer satisfies the notification&#039;s own conditions, including the prescribed value-addition requirement. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that simultaneous DEPB or drawback benefit is not a complete disqualification, but the exemption remains available only on proof of compliance with the stipulated value-addition condition. On the record, such compliance was not established to the Tribunal&#039;s satisfaction, yet the denial could not stand solely on the ground of DEPB availment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 936 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212280</link>
      <description>Availment of DEPB benefit does not, by itself, bar exemption under Notification No. 32/97-Cus.; the decisive question is whether the importer satisfies the notification&#039;s own conditions, including the prescribed value-addition requirement. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that simultaneous DEPB or drawback benefit is not a complete disqualification, but the exemption remains available only on proof of compliance with the stipulated value-addition condition. On the record, such compliance was not established to the Tribunal&#039;s satisfaction, yet the denial could not stand solely on the ground of DEPB availment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>