<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 927 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration. The appellant was granted the opportunity to provide evidence for the EODC Certificate presented during the personal hearing, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 927 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration. The appellant was granted the opportunity to provide evidence for the EODC Certificate presented during the personal hearing, and the appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>