<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1143 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212255</link>
    <description>The Kerala High Court directed the respondents to refrain from encashing the bank guarantees until the statutory appeal period expires. The bank guarantees would only be invoked if the petitioners fail to file appeals within the stipulated period. The court disposed of the writ petition, instructing the respondents to adhere to the assurances given and extend the benefits of previous judgments to the petitioners regarding the bank guarantee invocation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1143 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212255</link>
      <description>The Kerala High Court directed the respondents to refrain from encashing the bank guarantees until the statutory appeal period expires. The bank guarantees would only be invoked if the petitioners fail to file appeals within the stipulated period. The court disposed of the writ petition, instructing the respondents to adhere to the assurances given and extend the benefits of previous judgments to the petitioners regarding the bank guarantee invocation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>