<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 787 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212246</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding a refund claim for duty paid on scrap of wires and cables was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the non-transfer of duty elements to customers, leading to the rejection of their claim amounting to Rs. 18,17,133. Despite citing precedents, including a Tribunal decision and a Supreme Court case, the lack of proof regarding the non-passing of duty elements resulted in the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantiating the non-transfer of duty elements to customers to support refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 787 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212246</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding a refund claim for duty paid on scrap of wires and cables was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate the non-transfer of duty elements to customers, leading to the rejection of their claim amounting to Rs. 18,17,133. Despite citing precedents, including a Tribunal decision and a Supreme Court case, the lack of proof regarding the non-passing of duty elements resulted in the dismissal of the appeal. The judgment emphasized the necessity of substantiating the non-transfer of duty elements to customers to support refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>