https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212244 The appeal was restored as the court held that dismissing appeals solely due to the absence of clearance by the Committee on Disputes was not valid post the apex court's directions. The court clarified that obtaining approval from the Committee was no longer required for litigations, and appeals could be filed without NOC. The judgment emphasized the importance of aligning with the apex court's directives to ensure statutory rights to challenge orders were not hindered by unnecessary requirements. The case was directed for final hearing on a specified date. en-us Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212244 The appeal was restored as the court held that dismissing appeals solely due to the absence of clearance by the Committee on Disputes was not valid post the apex court's directions. The court clarified that obtaining approval from the Committee was no longer required for litigations, and appeals could be filed without NOC. The judgment emphasized the importance of aligning with the apex court's directives to ensure statutory rights to challenge orders were not hindered by unnecessary requirements. The case was directed for final hearing on a specified date. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212244