<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 781 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212240</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value of worn and used clothing must be accepted under customs valuation rules unless the department establishes a recognised ground for rejection. NIDB data or contemporaneous imports can justify enhancement only where the goods are shown to be truly comparable in quality, type, use and condition, and where the record supports an exception such as extra consideration or a special relationship. Mere reliance on import entries, without proof of those elements, is insufficient to discard the declared value. The stated position is that assessable value enhancement is not justified on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 781 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212240</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value of worn and used clothing must be accepted under customs valuation rules unless the department establishes a recognised ground for rejection. NIDB data or contemporaneous imports can justify enhancement only where the goods are shown to be truly comparable in quality, type, use and condition, and where the record supports an exception such as extra consideration or a special relationship. Mere reliance on import entries, without proof of those elements, is insufficient to discard the declared value. The stated position is that assessable value enhancement is not justified on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>