https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212220 The government upheld the orders-in-appeal, determining that all goods mentioned in the export documents were indeed exported, and the rebate of duty on all engines needed to be sanctioned. Consequently, the revision applications by the Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur against the rebate claims filed by M/s. A.G. Enterprises were rejected for lacking merit under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act. en-us Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212220 The government upheld the orders-in-appeal, determining that all goods mentioned in the export documents were indeed exported, and the rebate of duty on all engines needed to be sanctioned. Consequently, the revision applications by the Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Kanpur against the rebate claims filed by M/s. A.G. Enterprises were rejected for lacking merit under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212220