https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212216 The Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against duty recovery for destroyed goods, emphasizing the need to prove goods' unfitness for consumption to claim duty remission under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment upheld the decisions of the appellate Commissioner and CESTAT, concluding that the appeal lacked substantial legal questions. en-us Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212216 The Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against duty recovery for destroyed goods, emphasizing the need to prove goods' unfitness for consumption to claim duty remission under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The judgment upheld the decisions of the appellate Commissioner and CESTAT, concluding that the appeal lacked substantial legal questions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212216