<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1132 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212214</link>
    <description>The Appeals were filed against a common impugned order confirming a demand of Rs.2,51,54,117/- due to alleged manufacturing and clearance of goods without paying duty, along with imposed penalties. The Tribunal found that the impugned order was passed without due consideration of evidence produced by the Appellants and without affording proper opportunities for cross-examination. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication, with directions to allow cross-examination, hear both sides, and consider all evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1132 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212214</link>
      <description>The Appeals were filed against a common impugned order confirming a demand of Rs.2,51,54,117/- due to alleged manufacturing and clearance of goods without paying duty, along with imposed penalties. The Tribunal found that the impugned order was passed without due consideration of evidence produced by the Appellants and without affording proper opportunities for cross-examination. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication, with directions to allow cross-examination, hear both sides, and consider all evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>