<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1125 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that appellants must follow the re-credit procedure through a refund claim only, as mandated by the BDH Industries Ltd. case. The appellants&#039; argument that the reversal of credit was done under protest and without a show-cause notice was deemed irrelevant. The Tribunal directed the appellants to reverse the credit with interest, file a refund claim promptly, and comply with the legal precedent set by the BDH Industries Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1125 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that appellants must follow the re-credit procedure through a refund claim only, as mandated by the BDH Industries Ltd. case. The appellants&#039; argument that the reversal of credit was done under protest and without a show-cause notice was deemed irrelevant. The Tribunal directed the appellants to reverse the credit with interest, file a refund claim promptly, and comply with the legal precedent set by the BDH Industries Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>