https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212202 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the adverse order under the Central Excise Act, 1954, and remanded the case to the revisionary authority for a fresh decision. The Court found that the petitioner's additional documents on proof of export were not considered, leading to an incomplete decision. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to resubmit these documents, and the revisionary authority was directed to reconsider the case in compliance with the law. The Joint Secretary to the Government of India was tasked with making a new decision within six months, with the petitioner required to act promptly. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212202 The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the adverse order under the Central Excise Act, 1954, and remanded the case to the revisionary authority for a fresh decision. The Court found that the petitioner's additional documents on proof of export were not considered, leading to an incomplete decision. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to resubmit these documents, and the revisionary authority was directed to reconsider the case in compliance with the law. The Joint Secretary to the Government of India was tasked with making a new decision within six months, with the petitioner required to act promptly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212202