<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 483 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212196</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Supreme Court upheld the recovery of interest on the differential amount paid on supplementary invoices. The appellant&#039;s charging of the differential amount through these invoices constituted a case of short payment of duty under relevant sections of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) had modified the lower authority&#039;s order, which was unchallenged by the department, leading to the complete affirmation of the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and judicial precedents in resolving indirect taxation disputes, ensuring consistency and compliance with legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 483 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212196</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Supreme Court upheld the recovery of interest on the differential amount paid on supplementary invoices. The appellant&#039;s charging of the differential amount through these invoices constituted a case of short payment of duty under relevant sections of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) had modified the lower authority&#039;s order, which was unchallenged by the department, leading to the complete affirmation of the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and judicial precedents in resolving indirect taxation disputes, ensuring consistency and compliance with legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>