<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 754 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212181</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal annulled a small service tax demand with penalties and interest, ruling in favor of the appellant due to lack of evidence supporting the department&#039;s allegations. The tribunal found that the appellant was not an authorized service provider, as claimed by the department, and waived the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal hearing. Emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence, the tribunal annulled the demand, penalties, and interest imposed by the adjudication order, ultimately allowing the appeal and highlighting the necessity for substantiation in tax adjudications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 754 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212181</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal annulled a small service tax demand with penalties and interest, ruling in favor of the appellant due to lack of evidence supporting the department&#039;s allegations. The tribunal found that the appellant was not an authorized service provider, as claimed by the department, and waived the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal hearing. Emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence, the tribunal annulled the demand, penalties, and interest imposed by the adjudication order, ultimately allowing the appeal and highlighting the necessity for substantiation in tax adjudications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>