<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 752 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212179</link>
    <description>The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court remanded the case to ascertain the claim of receivables based on the time lapse between the delivery of goods and realization of money. Despite a clear directive, the authorities failed to implement the judgment effectively. The appellant successfully argued for deduction on the actual basis of interest receivable on each invoice, emphasizing the time-related and value-based nature of interest. The Tribunal ruled in favor of allowing deduction on the actual basis for each invoice without applying an average rate, following the Apex Court&#039;s directive to reduce litigation and determine admissibility of deductions. The appeal of the appellant was allowed, setting aside the order of the appellate authority below.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 752 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212179</link>
      <description>The Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court remanded the case to ascertain the claim of receivables based on the time lapse between the delivery of goods and realization of money. Despite a clear directive, the authorities failed to implement the judgment effectively. The appellant successfully argued for deduction on the actual basis of interest receivable on each invoice, emphasizing the time-related and value-based nature of interest. The Tribunal ruled in favor of allowing deduction on the actual basis for each invoice without applying an average rate, following the Apex Court&#039;s directive to reduce litigation and determine admissibility of deductions. The appeal of the appellant was allowed, setting aside the order of the appellate authority below.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>