<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1113 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s decision lacked a thorough analysis regarding whether two separate units should be treated as one entity for Central Excise duty calculation. The Tribunal noted the distinct physical and operational characteristics of the units were not adequately considered, leading to a remand for a more comprehensive review. Additionally, the issue of a purchaser being considered a &#039;related person&#039; for a differential duty demand was addressed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of the relationships involved before reaching a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1113 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s decision lacked a thorough analysis regarding whether two separate units should be treated as one entity for Central Excise duty calculation. The Tribunal noted the distinct physical and operational characteristics of the units were not adequately considered, leading to a remand for a more comprehensive review. Additionally, the issue of a purchaser being considered a &#039;related person&#039; for a differential duty demand was addressed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of the relationships involved before reaching a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>