<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1104 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212148</link>
    <description>Metallising, lacquering and laminating duty-paid polyester film do not amount to manufacture, as earlier decisions had already held the process to be non-manufacturing. Once the activity is outside the scope of manufacture, the foundation for duty demand falls away and interest and penalty cannot survive. Filing a classification list or paying duty under protest does not create liability where none exists in law. Decisions relied upon to support the contrary view were distinguished as not constituting a final binding determination on the same issue. The duty demand, interest and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1104 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212148</link>
      <description>Metallising, lacquering and laminating duty-paid polyester film do not amount to manufacture, as earlier decisions had already held the process to be non-manufacturing. Once the activity is outside the scope of manufacture, the foundation for duty demand falls away and interest and penalty cannot survive. Filing a classification list or paying duty under protest does not create liability where none exists in law. Decisions relied upon to support the contrary view were distinguished as not constituting a final binding determination on the same issue. The duty demand, interest and penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>