<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1192 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212130</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed delay condonation applications and revision petitions challenging the Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s direction on interest levy for short tax payments. The State of Kerala&#039;s delay condonation plea, citing a Full Bench decision overruling a previous ruling, was rejected due to insufficient cause for the delay exceeding one year. The Court emphasized the need for proper explanation for delay condonation, differentiating the case from precedents like CIT v. Ramachandra Hatcheries. Legal principles governing delay condonation were discussed, rejecting the notion that unchallenged court decisions are beyond scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1192 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212130</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed delay condonation applications and revision petitions challenging the Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s direction on interest levy for short tax payments. The State of Kerala&#039;s delay condonation plea, citing a Full Bench decision overruling a previous ruling, was rejected due to insufficient cause for the delay exceeding one year. The Court emphasized the need for proper explanation for delay condonation, differentiating the case from precedents like CIT v. Ramachandra Hatcheries. Legal principles governing delay condonation were discussed, rejecting the notion that unchallenged court decisions are beyond scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>