<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 294 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212128</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order imposing penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was overturned. The Judge determined that the confusion regarding whether the appellants were providing a service or supplying manpower warranted setting aside the order, particularly if the Revenue contested the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 294 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212128</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order imposing penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was overturned. The Judge determined that the confusion regarding whether the appellants were providing a service or supplying manpower warranted setting aside the order, particularly if the Revenue contested the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>