<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 293 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212125</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application to set aside an order directing reimbursement to the company-in-liquidation. The court found that the adjustment of funds by Provident Fund authorities towards other related establishments was appropriate due to functional integrality among them. The court concluded that the order was legally valid and there was no basis to remit the amount to the company-in-liquidation, as the adjustment was justified under the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 293 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212125</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application to set aside an order directing reimbursement to the company-in-liquidation. The court found that the adjustment of funds by Provident Fund authorities towards other related establishments was appropriate due to functional integrality among them. The court concluded that the order was legally valid and there was no basis to remit the amount to the company-in-liquidation, as the adjustment was justified under the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>