<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 292 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the dismissal by the CIT(A) and directing a review on its merits. It clarified that directors of companies struck off from ROC records are authorized to sign appeal forms, ensuring legal recourse in such situations. The decision emphasized the responsibilities of directors even after company strike-off, highlighting the need for proper authorization in signing appeal forms under the IT Act and Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 292 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the dismissal by the CIT(A) and directing a review on its merits. It clarified that directors of companies struck off from ROC records are authorized to sign appeal forms, ensuring legal recourse in such situations. The decision emphasized the responsibilities of directors even after company strike-off, highlighting the need for proper authorization in signing appeal forms under the IT Act and Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>