<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 283 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212115</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the payment of advance tax on estimated income before the search date was crucial in excluding the income from the scope of undisclosed income for the broken period. The judgment highlighted the significance of financial actions and intent in determining the treatment of income in cases involving incomplete accounting records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 283 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212115</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the payment of advance tax on estimated income before the search date was crucial in excluding the income from the scope of undisclosed income for the broken period. The judgment highlighted the significance of financial actions and intent in determining the treatment of income in cases involving incomplete accounting records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>