https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212104 Bail cancellation in a Central Excise Act prosecution requires material showing abuse of the liberty already granted or a real likelihood of interference with investigation. The Bombay High Court noted that the accused had been examined by the Central Excise Officer, the earlier grievance about non-attendance had already been addressed by the Magistrate through exemption for treatment, and no evidence showed that custody was necessary to protect the inquiry. On that basis, the application for cancellation of bail was rejected and the existing bail order was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212104 Bail cancellation in a Central Excise Act prosecution requires material showing abuse of the liberty already granted or a real likelihood of interference with investigation. The Bombay High Court noted that the accused had been examined by the Central Excise Officer, the earlier grievance about non-attendance had already been addressed by the Magistrate through exemption for treatment, and no evidence showed that custody was necessary to protect the inquiry. On that basis, the application for cancellation of bail was rejected and the existing bail order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212104