https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212099 The tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the duty demand for certain periods and dismissing the appellants' appeal to adjust excess duty paid. The judgment emphasized the necessity of timely duty payment to avoid accruing interest, highlighting that mere subsequent payment does not guarantee revenue neutrality. The appellants were directed to deposit a specified percentage of the demanded amount within a set timeframe to comply with statutory obligations. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212099 The tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the duty demand for certain periods and dismissing the appellants' appeal to adjust excess duty paid. The judgment emphasized the necessity of timely duty payment to avoid accruing interest, highlighting that mere subsequent payment does not guarantee revenue neutrality. The appellants were directed to deposit a specified percentage of the demanded amount within a set timeframe to comply with statutory obligations. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212099